Assassin's Creed 3 - Part 4-1
At last, we are done with audio issues. And just in time to lead the troops in Assassin’s Creed 3.
Streamed at https://www.twitch.tv/newdarkcloud
Since starting this replay series with the first Assassin’s Creed, I have consistently hounded Ubisoft for it’s strange concept of moral relativity. In no uncertain terms, these are ultimately games written from a centrist, fence-sitting perspective, mistaking false or exaggerated equivalencies with deep philosophy, like South Park and similarly rote works.
While I still maintain that position in the context of the broader shadow war between the Assassins and Templars, this viewpoint that seeks to relentlessly tear down all other perspectives so that it can demonstrate how much smarter it is to sit in the middle has a lot of ammo to use against the American Colonial Settlers of the mid-to-late 1700s. Suddenly, in this specific, concrete context, this otherwise worthless strain of thought is able to launch into substantive critiques of the era.
I am compelled by this random, otherwise completely missable conversation between Ratonhnhaké꞉ton and Samuel Adams starting at 18:55. In broad strokes, Connor raises the point to Samuel Adams that spreading word that loyalists fired first when the truth was that no one knows if that’s true is a dishonest tactic. Thus, the question is raised whether or not resorting to cheap propaganda and dirty tricks risks poisoning the foundation of the new country before it even gets built.
Ubisoft has no need to create false equivalencies to criticize the “good guys” of the Revolution, because it’s already known that these people were deeply flawed, deeply hypocritical human beings. History has already done the heavy lifting, documenting the various atrocities committed by the colonists. All Ubisoft has to do to bring them down a peg is to tell the unabashed truth of it all.